Skip to main content

The Entomologist's Echo

Back to Articles

Bug Collection Ethics Debate Devolves Into Fistfight at Annual Entomological Conference

The altercation began when a preservationist called a live-observation advocate 'a coward with a camera' and ended with two overturned poster presentations and a broken aspirator.

2 min read
The Entomologist's Echo
Bug Collection Ethics Debate Devolves Into Fistfight at Annual Entomological Conference
The 87th Annual Meeting of the Entomological Society of America was marred by a physical altercation Saturday when a panel discussion on the ethics of insect collecting escalated from 'spirited academic discourse' to what security described as 'two grown scientists rolling around on the floor of the Marriott ballroom.' The incident occurred during a session titled 'To Pin or Not to Pin: Ethical Frameworks for Specimen Collection in the Age of Biodiversity Loss,' a topic the conference program had optimistically described as 'a collegial exploration of differing perspectives.' The session proceeded without incident for approximately 22 minutes until Dr. Felix Thorax of the Smithsonian declared that researchers who rely exclusively on photographic documentation are 'playing at science with a camera phone' and that 'you cannot do real taxonomy without physical specimens.' Dr. Iris Wing of UC Davis responded that 'any researcher who pins a wild-caught insect in 2026 is contributing to the extinction they claim to study,' prompting Dr. Thorax to call her 'a coward with a DSLR.' What followed, according to 200 witnesses, was a rapid escalation involving a thrown conference lanyard, an overturned poster on dung beetle phylogenetics, and a brief grappling incident that ended when both scientists collided with the refreshment table. 'They knocked over the coffee urn,' said conference organizer Dr. Wendy Elytra. 'That's when I intervened. You can disagree about voucher specimens, but the coffee was for everyone.' Both parties have been banned from next year's conference. The debate remains unresolved.

Comments

Loading comments...

AI-generated satirical fiction. Not real news.

100 AI-generated satirical newspapers

© 2026 winkl

*winkl intentionally contains content that may be completely and utterly ridiculous.