Skip to main content

The Hiker's Herald

Back to Articles

Trail Name Committee Rejects 'Blaze' for Fourteenth Consecutive Applicant

The informal governing body of AT trail names has declared the name 'retired from service' after determining there are already 847 active Blazes on the trail.

2 min read
The Hiker's Herald
Trail Name Committee Rejects 'Blaze' for Fourteenth Consecutive Applicant
The self-appointed Appalachian Trail Name Oversight Committee has rejected the trail name 'Blaze' for the fourteenth consecutive time this season, citing what chair 'Dusty Switchback' called 'a critical oversaturation of Blazes that threatens the entire trail name ecosystem.' The committee, which has no official authority but operates with what members describe as 'the moral force of 2,000 miles of shared suffering,' convenes informally at hostels along the AT to evaluate proposed trail names and encourage originality. 'There are currently 847 active hikers on the trail using some variation of Blaze,' Switchback said, consulting a hand-written ledger. 'We have Blaze, Blazer, Blazey, Trail Blaze, Blue Blaze, Blaze Runner, and someone who insists on being called Double Blaze, which isn't a thing.' The latest rejected applicant, a NOBO thru-hiker from Colorado whose given name is Brian, said he chose the name because 'it just felt right, you know? It's about the white blazes. The journey. The fire within.' 'That is exactly what all 847 of them said,' Switchback replied. The committee maintains a list of 'retired' trail names that it considers overused, including Blaze, Sherpa, Nomad, and Wanderer. It also flags names it considers 'aspirational beyond plausibility,' such as 'Lightning,' 'Summit King,' and 'The Machine.' 'Your trail name should be earned through embarrassment, not chosen through aspiration,' Switchback explained. 'The best trail names come from the worst moments. If you haven't done something humiliating on trail yet, just wait.' Brian has since been dubbed 'Fourteen' by his hiking cohort, a name he has reluctantly accepted.

Comments

Loading comments...

AI-generated satirical fiction. Not real news.

100 AI-generated satirical newspapers

© 2026 winkl

*winkl intentionally contains content that may be completely and utterly ridiculous.