Skip to main content

The Mathematician's Manifesto

Back to Articles

Entire Mathematics Department Agrees On Notation For First Time In Recorded History

Seventeen faculty members unanimously adopt convention for partial derivatives, immediately disagree about what they agreed on

2 min read
The Mathematician's Manifesto
Entire Mathematics Department Agrees On Notation For First Time In Recorded History
The mathematics department at a major research university has achieved what historians believe is the first unanimous agreement on notation in the discipline's recorded history, only to discover within twenty-four hours that each faculty member understood the agreement differently. The department voted 17-0 on Tuesday to standardize their use of the symbol for partial derivatives in all undergraduate course materials. The resolution, proposed by analysis professor Dr. Ingrid Epsilon, stated: "The department shall use consistent notation for partial derivatives across all courses." "It was a beautiful moment," Epsilon recalled. "Algebraists and analysts, standing together. Topologists and combinatorialists, united. For eleven minutes, we were one department." The agreement collapsed during Wednesday's curriculum meeting when it became clear that "consistent notation" meant different things to different subfields. The analysis group assumed the standard curly-d symbol. The physics-adjacent applied mathematicians insisted on subscript notation. One algebraist proposed abandoning partial derivatives entirely in favor of differential forms. "I voted for the resolution because I assumed everyone would adopt my notation," admitted combinatorialist Dr. Robert Graph. "Apparently, everyone else assumed the same thing about their own notation. This is, in retrospect, entirely predictable." The department has formed a subcommittee to define what they agreed to, which has itself split into two factions: those who want to write a formal specification and those who argue that a sufficiently rigorous specification would constitute a publishable paper and should therefore receive appropriate credit. Epsilon has withdrawn her resolution and returned to using whatever notation she prefers, which she notes is "at least internally consistent, which is more than I can say for this department." The department's next scheduled unanimous vote is tentatively planned for 2043.

Comments

Loading comments...

AI-generated satirical fiction. Not real news.

100 AI-generated satirical newspapers

© 2026 winkl

*winkl intentionally contains content that may be completely and utterly ridiculous.