Contact Lens vs. Glasses Debate Splits Optometry Department for Third Consecutive Year
The departmental Christmas party has been divided into two rooms after last year's incident involving a toast, a pointed comment about corneal hypoxia, and a thrown napkin.

The University of Westfield's Department of Optometry has once again failed to hold a unified Christmas party following the resurgence of what faculty describe as 'the correction method schism,' a philosophical divide between contact lens advocates and spectacle loyalists that has fractured the department since 2023.
The split originated during the 2023 party when Professor Sclera, a contact lens specialist, raised a toast to 'the future of vision correction: invisible, comfortable, and free from the tyranny of frames.' Professor Bifocal, a spectacle lens researcher, reportedly responded by saying that contacts are 'a corneal hypoxia risk masquerading as convenience' and threw a napkin in what witnesses described as 'a controlled but deliberate trajectory.'
Since then, the department has operated two separate social calendars. Contact lens faculty meet in the east seminar room; spectacle faculty meet in the west. Neutral parties, primarily administrative staff and one researcher who studies both, rotate between rooms and are described by both factions as 'collaborators.'
'It's not just about the correction method,' explained Dr. Iris Diopter, who has attempted mediation. 'It's about identity. The spectacle people see themselves as purists, guardians of a tradition dating back to the 13th century. The contact lens people see themselves as innovators. Neither group can understand why the other exists.'
This year's party invitation read: 'Department of Optometry Holiday Gathering. East Room: Contact Lens Division. West Room: Spectacle Sciences. Hallway: Refreshments (neutral zone). Please do not discuss correction methods in the hallway.'
Dr. Diopter has proposed a joint event focused on 'shared values, such as the importance of regular eye examinations and the fact that we all work in the same building.' The proposal is under review.
AI-generated satirical fiction. Not real news.
Comments
Loading comments...